Proposed Mining Tax Not Good for Australia: New Report

In another setback to the mining tax proposed by the federal government a senate inquiry found that it would affect Australia’s competitiveness and should be cancelled. The Western Australia Liberal senator and committee’s chairman Mathias Cormann summarized the findings on the minerals resource rent tax (MRRT) in Perth.

As per the findings of the inquiry the tax was developed through an improper process and would create a $19 billion black hole in the federal budget. Senator Cormann said that it should be scrapped and of course the Government should start from scratch with a genuine process, one that is open, inclusive and transparent and one which includes all stake-holders, including State and Territory Governments as part of the process.

The report was released at a miner’s conference and opposed Greens leader Bob Brown’s claim that most of the mines in Australia were owned by foreigners. Andrew Forrest the chief executive of Fortescue Metals Group said that what Mr Brown needs to do is to not support a tax that will exacerbate that situation and shift Australian ownership and development projects offshore because they can no longer afford to compete against projects that are already developed.

A spokesman for federal Treasurer Wayne Swan said that Senator Cormann had rushed out a half-baked and blatantly political report so he could tell a miners’ conference that they paid too much tax. He added that with a $430 billion pipeline of investment the resources sector had a bright outlook and the Opposition scare campaign about the industry’s future was complete rubbish.

Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) chief executive Simon Bennison was happy with the report saying that the MRRT raises serious and unresolved constitutional issues which will clearly affect the international competitiveness of emerging companies and further detrimentally impact Australia's sovereign risk as an attractive place to invest. He also called on the government to scrap the proposed tax.

Joel Scanlon

Written by

Joel Scanlon

Joel relocated to Australia in 1995 from the United Kingdom and spent five years working in the mining industry as an exploration geotechnician. His role involved utilizing GIS mapping and CAD software. Upon transitioning to the North Coast of NSW, Australia, Joel embarked on a career as a graphic designer at a well-known consultancy firm. Subsequently, he established a successful web services business catering to companies across the eastern seaboard of Australia. It was during this time that he conceived and launched News-Medical.Net. Joel has been an integral part of AZoNetwork since its inception in 2000. Joel possesses a keen interest in exploring the boundaries of technology, comprehending its potential impact on society, and actively engaging with AI-driven solutions and advancements.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Scanlon, Joel. (2019, February 18). Proposed Mining Tax Not Good for Australia: New Report. AZoMining. Retrieved on November 23, 2024 from https://www.azomining.com/News.aspx?newsID=4395.

  • MLA

    Scanlon, Joel. "Proposed Mining Tax Not Good for Australia: New Report". AZoMining. 23 November 2024. <https://www.azomining.com/News.aspx?newsID=4395>.

  • Chicago

    Scanlon, Joel. "Proposed Mining Tax Not Good for Australia: New Report". AZoMining. https://www.azomining.com/News.aspx?newsID=4395. (accessed November 23, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Scanlon, Joel. 2019. Proposed Mining Tax Not Good for Australia: New Report. AZoMining, viewed 23 November 2024, https://www.azomining.com/News.aspx?newsID=4395.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.